JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 6, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Fernando Reyes Cuartas

✓Claimant Revision De Constitucionalidad Del Decreto Legislativo 488/20

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Dentro del término de traslado a los ciudadanos, propio del trámite de revisión del decreto de la referencia, el ciudadano Carlos Ernesto Castañeda presentó un escrito de intervención en el que, además de pronunciarse sobre el examen de constitucionalidad de la disposición objeto de estudio, solicitó a la Corte adoptar una medida cautelar excepcional de suspensión provisional del artículo 4° referente a las vacaciones o, subsidiariamente, ordenar la inaplicación del mismo a todos los empleadores del país.

Luego de analizar la petición, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZARLA, por improcedente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de "medida cautelar" formulada por el ciudadano Carlos Ernesto Castaneda, en el marco de la revision de constitucionalidad del Decreto Legislativo 488 de 2020, "por el cual se dictan medidas de orden laboral, dentro del Estado de Emergencia Economica, Social y Ecologica", identificado con el radicado RE-252.
  2. Segundo. Contra la presente decision no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.